A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out involving potential neighbours over the construction of a wall in a coastal web page within a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes captivated national consideration next an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed family house at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental issues, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Periods article about René Collier and also the Irish Periods posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has advanced right into a really publicised lawful fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about development is effective at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a corporation director respectively, seek to make their family dwelling. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Eire’s coastline, in which advancement pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of proven citizens. According to the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining produced by their potential neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted under planning authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally inhabitants of Dublin Road, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their preparing authorization by building a wall over and above the boundaries in their internet site, bringing about an encroachment on the Distinctive Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as a result areas are matter to demanding controls below European and Irish environmental regulation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments might have lasting ecological repercussions, especially in a very sensitive coastal environment which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach in their planning permission, and say the wall, that's partly crafted, is in the correct place. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding so as to maintain their perspective, an allegation which has been recurring in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal preparing disputes, wherever views of The ocean are both remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained remarkable endeavours from the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, As outlined by sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded as a result of waist-high drinking water throughout a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Moments, an image which includes considering that grow to be emblematic from the depth in the dispute. These steps weren't simply symbolic; they were being intended to gather Visible evidence with the wall’s placement relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning through the sea Irish Instances claimed, describing how the two Adult males entered the drinking water all through serious weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm water to photograph the location became Just about the most striking descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Occasions short article about accountant Paul Feely noted that these kinds of steps have been cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief that the wall extended into a location influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was becoming encroached upon.
The gatherings at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being coated in detail with the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as visitors sought to grasp the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court listened to even more submissions on whether interim orders ought to be granted to halt construction pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital instant during the lawful timeline.
For the Main on the dispute can be a disagreement in excess of boundaries, arranging compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep the wall, as built, goes beyond what was approved and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, is described as meticulous in his assessment of arranging documents, maps, and conditions hooked up Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 on the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally stressed that their motion is inspired by issue for environmental defense and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private watch, insisting alternatively that it's about ensuring that progress at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they've explained their long-standing link to the region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a couple basically trying to make a family members household in accordance with the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches with a Unique Spot of Conservation and say that every one works are already completed dependant on Expert tips and authorised plans. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, like coming into the sea for the duration of a storm, will not alter the fundamental points.
The case has also elevated broader questions about how organizing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute more than construction of wall at coastal website has grown to be a shorthand description for your condition a large number of observers see as significantly prevalent. As sea degrees rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats has become additional contentious.
The Irish Periods report about René Collier mentioned which the businessman had previously been linked to regional advocacy on preparing and environmental issues, while not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Situations short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how folks from very unique Skilled backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, have become synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Periods coverage emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by waist-large h2o throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Situations and René Collier waded by means of waistline-superior water in the course of a storm to photograph the location Irish Times are phrases that appeared frequently in coverage, reflecting equally the Actual physical truth of the coastline and also the symbolic character with the act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these actions shown commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see being an too much approach.
As the High Court proceedings carry on, the outcome remains uncertain. The court docket will have to determine whether the wall as created complies with planning permission and whether or not any encroachment into a Unique Region of Conservation has happened. The lawful arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and arranging problems. But the human component continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Stay alongside one another long once the authorized expenses have been compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of construction is effective at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, though the implications of the case increase over and above that address. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the importance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. It also underscores how promptly a local disagreement can escalate when basic challenges including environmental security and home rights are perceived to generally be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays an area of all-natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre in the dispute stands partly crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Whether it's going to in the long run be altered, eradicated, or completed as planned will rely on the courtroom’s results. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will possible continue to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to Probably the most closely watched preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent years.