A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out between possible neighbours more than the construction of the wall in a coastal web page inside of a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has attracted countrywide awareness pursuing an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed loved ones property at Sutton Strand, in which allegations of organizing breaches, environmental issues, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Situations post about René Collier along with the Irish Moments report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a neighborhood disagreement has developed right into a very publicised lawful battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about building works at the site on Dublin Road, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and an organization director respectively, seek to create their spouse and children dwelling. The situation has grown to be emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, the place advancement pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of set up people. Based on the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming constructed by their possible neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted under scheduling permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both inhabitants of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms of their planning authorization by building a wall over and above the boundaries in their internet site, leading to an encroachment on the Special Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result locations are subject matter to strict controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. Within their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have lasting ecological penalties, specifically inside of a sensitive coastal setting such as Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach in their scheduling permission, and say the wall, which can be partly designed, is in the proper position. Their legal crew has characterised the motion being an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful enhancement. The pair accuse litigants of looking for to halt homebuilding in an effort to protect their watch, an allegation which has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal organizing disputes, the place views of the sea are each extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic endeavours by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, according to sworn proof referenced from the Irish Occasions. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by means of midsection-superior water all through a storm to photograph the site Irish Periods, an image which includes considering that become emblematic in the intensity from the dispute. These steps weren't simply symbolic; they had been meant to Acquire visual evidence of the wall’s position relative to tidal lines and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site within the sea Irish Times claimed, describing how the two Adult males entered the h2o through critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm water to photograph the internet site became one of the most hanging descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Periods post about accountant Paul Feely observed that this kind of actions ended up cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ belief the wall extended into an area impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was remaining encroached on.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were coated in detail because of the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Moments 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 turned widely searched phrases as readers sought to comprehend the track record and Rene Collier implications of the case. On that date, the High Court read further submissions on no matter whether interim orders need to be granted to halt building pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital instant from the lawful timeline.
For the Main from the dispute is a disagreement more than boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain which the wall, as produced, goes further than what was permitted and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has long been called meticulous in his evaluation of preparing files, maps, and ailments connected to the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally stressed that their motion is determined by concern for environmental protection and adherence to scheduling law. They reject claims that the case is about preserving A personal watch, insisting instead that it's about ensuring that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have explained their lengthy-standing connection to the region and their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On another side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a pair just looking to make a family members dwelling in accordance with the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches on a Specific Region of Conservation and say that each one will work happen to be completed based upon professional suggestions and permitted designs. Their legal professionals have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as getting into the sea all through a storm, do not change the underlying facts.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how planning disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute around design of wall at coastal web page happens to be a shorthand description for just a problem that numerous observers see as significantly popular. As sea degrees rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming extra contentious.
The Irish Periods report about René Collier mentioned which the businessman had previously been linked to regional advocacy on preparing and environmental issues, while not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Situations report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from very diverse Expert backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from the sea Irish Moments protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by way of midsection-large drinking water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations and René Collier waded via waistline-significant h2o throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Situations are phrases that appeared frequently in coverage, reflecting equally the Bodily fact of your coastline and also the symbolic nature with the act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these steps shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an abnormal tactic.
Given that the High Court proceedings go on, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom have to ascertain if the wall as created complies with setting up authorization and irrespective of whether any encroachment right into a Special Area of Conservation has transpired. The lawful arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and setting up ailments. Nevertheless the human factor remains central: neighbours who will have to Stay along with each other extensive following the legal prices are paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over development operates at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the situation prolong beyond that tackle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the value of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. Furthermore, it underscores how rapidly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential troubles such as environmental safety and assets rights are perceived to get at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains a spot of pure elegance and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre with the dispute stands partially designed, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal queries. Irrespective of whether it's going to in the long run be altered, eradicated, or accomplished as prepared will depend upon the court docket’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will most likely proceed to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to Among the most intently viewed arranging disputes in north Dublin lately.